<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Point&#8230;Optimism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/</link>
	<description>Just another ZaMoose.org weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wha</title>
		<link>http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Wha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Optimism without a strong base for believe: I don't think I will pass out on a stump or a toilet this fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optimism without a strong base for believe: I don&#8217;t think I will pass out on a stump or a toilet this fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobrainer</title>
		<link>http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobrainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agentorange.zamoose.org/2005/08/12/pointoptimism/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>It is definitely nice to hear such positive things about the wideouts this year after being disappointed last season. Whitehurst is proven (and disproven) but I gotta believe that he'll most likely resemble the Whitehurst of 2003.  It is interesting to note the depth at QB.  Unfortunately none of the backups have really played, but we've got Proctor, and a couple of redshirt freshmen (Reese and Harper).  And our running backs look pretty solid too.  Coleman, Merriweather, and Browning have all shown great talent at one point or another, and now throw Davis into that mix.  My 3 questions are:  can the O-Line get the job done to let the ball advance as it shoul?  will the tight ends be able to absorb Spence's new offense?  and will Spence's offense prove itself worthy.  

Sure I'm wearing my orange colored glasses, but the offseason is leaving me feeling quite optimistic (perhaps too optimistic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is definitely nice to hear such positive things about the wideouts this year after being disappointed last season. Whitehurst is proven (and disproven) but I gotta believe that he&#8217;ll most likely resemble the Whitehurst of 2003.  It is interesting to note the depth at QB.  Unfortunately none of the backups have really played, but we&#8217;ve got Proctor, and a couple of redshirt freshmen (Reese and Harper).  And our running backs look pretty solid too.  Coleman, Merriweather, and Browning have all shown great talent at one point or another, and now throw Davis into that mix.  My 3 questions are:  can the O-Line get the job done to let the ball advance as it shoul?  will the tight ends be able to absorb Spence&#8217;s new offense?  and will Spence&#8217;s offense prove itself worthy.  </p>
<p>Sure I&#8217;m wearing my orange colored glasses, but the offseason is leaving me feeling quite optimistic (perhaps too optimistic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
